It would appear I am completing week three during week seven. 89th place, here I come!
I was going to write about HDTV as "anything technology-related" in response to
Melissa's post about remastered Star Trek, but I found myself haranguing poor Patrick this afternoon in a comment on
his blog and chose to reproduce that here, instead.
Read his post on the Koha Open Source Integrated Library System, which has generated a lot of
buzz this year, followed by my response:
Koha has a lot of potential, but there are some considerations I'd like to point out:
(1) We do not know for sure that it is "much cheaper." ILS costs depend on the size of the system, so a price quoted by a smaller library using open source would not apply to SPPL. We do not necessarily have anyone on staff qualified to maintain Koha, so migrating to Koha would likely require SPPL to establish a position description and budget to support a dedicated Systems Administrator. Additionally, we would be paying
LibLime,
Equinox (who work with
Evergreen open source ILS), or some other company to offer training and support in addition to the Systems Admin. Koha itself may be free, but there are startup and maintenance costs associated with migration, new servers, etc. How these costs compare to our current III costs is unknown.
(2) Koha lacks some important features we get from III, especially on the Acquisitions side. It may not yet be fully-featured enough to meet SPPLs needs.
(3) Quality control. I don't find
this Koha Zoom site to be particularly stellar, nor
this similar OPAC. There isn't a whole lot of difference between these implementations and many of the "out-of-the-box" III OPACs you see out there. Systems with dedicated staff and money for R&D get much better performance out of Koha.
(4) Security/vulnerability. Does using Open Source software expose SPPL to hacking?
(5) III does have a new product called
"Encore" which replicates many of the Koha OPAC features Patrick likes, although, granted, it is ridiculously expensive. Features such as reviews and book jacket covers are a subscription service which will cost extra no matter which system we're using.
(6) Will there be long term support for Koha? Joshua Ferraro (founder of LibLime) describes himself as Koha's "benevolent dictator" and says that Koha's success relies on the "spirit of cooperation," which sounds a bit flimsy.
That's not to say we should never consider open source, but it isn't necessarily a panacea, either.
...
My general feeling is that Open Source is not ready for prime-time, unless you've got incredible resources and professional programmers on staff (or a very small library system). Open Source ILSs are certainly worth keeping an eye on, and I do believe the future of library science rests with librarians (and
faux-brarians) getting hands-on with the architecture of information technology -- though I'm not necessarily volunteering to run out and get a computer science degree. Any takers?